I'm sending this to "Google Success Stories".

My success story has nothing to do with you. I am writing this message here because I can't find any other way to contact you. And this seems like something someone might actually read. I find the following statement extremely offencive. "Google's SafeSearch blocks web pages containing explicit sexual content from appearing in search results." Sexually explicit material is not in and of itself unsafe. Blocking violent images would be more about "safety". But that isn't mentioned. Procreation is sexually explicit. And without it we wouldn't be "safe", we wouldn't exist! Your insinuation is offencive and uneducated. I would appreciate it if you change the filter to include (thus excluding, by the nature on filtration)violent images. Or at least be direct and honest. Call it the "explicit sex" filter. Or "parental control" filter. But keep negative, moralistic, religious fundamentalist, crap in the opinion columns. It is not your place to suggest that there is something implicitly wrong with sexuality. What is sexually explicit about this anyway: http://www.collegeofmidwives.org/Images%202003/Donna_birth_CU_1978.jpg? No one is having sex in this photo. Maybe you should call it the "babes come from storks" filter.